I know that it has been a long time since I have written, but many times I wanted to write but was just to angry to do so. There are somethings that I have seen over the past few weeks that I need to comment upon. First, the visit our secretary of state had with Mexico. Second, Obama's visit to England. Third, Obama's answering of questions from people of Europe. Fourth, under what Constitutional provision is Obama not taking the TARP monies back from banks. Fifth, and finally, why does Europe love Obama so much?

First, if you saw anything about our secretary of state's visit to Mexico, you had to hear that she blamed part of the drug problem on America.  This is a running theme in the Obama administration. If you talk down about America, then maybe your enemies will come to like the USA. This happened when Obama was speaking to Europeans in Strausborg when he said that America had been arrogant and dismissive. Hillary was basically saying that capitalism is working for the drug trade. Demand in America is greater than the supply so the demand caused the problem. I don't see this as a drug issue, I see this as a border issue. One of the issues that scares me most is that we don't protect our borders and we don't enforce immigration laws. In fact, the administration not enforcing the laws on the books is a violation of Obama's oath of office. He swore to protect and uphold the Constitution....this includes the laws of the land. Well, the Constitution clearly sets forth that the job of the president, among others, is to enforce the laws passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by the President. There are laws on the books regarding illegal immigrants that are not being enforced and with the knowledge of the President. In fact, we have sanctuary cities in this country where the cities have told local law enforcement that they are to IGNORE the federal law of informing ICE of illegal immigrants. This should not go unnoticed by the administration but it is and Obama is not enforcing the laws of the land. And so it goes with Hillary as well. Blaming American for the drug problem is wrong and dangerous.  Why can't someone sue the President to get him to do the job that the Constitution requires of him? Did Obama and Hillary not take an oath to keep safe the people of America? But are they when they allow the border to be open and allow the fragrent violation and ignoring of federal immigration laws? There is no doubt that they have violated their oaths and should be held accountable to the people of America. I have no problem with the President not liking a law but it is not Constitutionally valid to not enforce a law when the president does not like it. If he does not like a law, then get Congress to change it or abolish it. The border with Mexico is our weak spot but no one will do anything about it.

Second, Obama was in England this past week. The prime minister of England, Gordon "Barack" Brown, did nothing but smile when Obama was near him. This is becasue Obama is loved in Europe, which should be a red flag to any one in America. Also, this is because Brown is having many troubles of his own so he will stick close to those that his people love - Obama. I have heard in the media that his trip is a success. I don't agree. Obama has done more in two months to turn our country toward socialism than any president before in the history of this country. He is about to give away to the IMF power over our banking system and give up the dollar as the basis of the world's economy. Obama wants one world order and that is that all people are dependent upon their government and all governments run the planet.  His trip was a failure for America's interest but a great success for the socialist/communist of the world. When the Russian president called Obama his "new comrade" I knew Obama was selling us out. Obama wants to get rid of our nuclear weapons but this is the only thing that keeps us safe from Russia, China and Iran.  If he thinks that the Russians can be trusted, he is not only not smart but dangerously so. 

Third, along with the second point, Obama was awful when answering questions without his teleprompter. When he was asked the question about who caused the global financial crisis, he funbled for over 2 minutes and said absolutely nothing....except to bash America some more.  I hear many people say that he is a great speaker......I don't think so.  I thnk that he is so ignorant of history that he cannot speak intelligently when he has to speak off the cuff.  I am sure that he has a team of speech writers. But when he is not prepared, he is not a very good speaker at all. This is because he is afraid of offending someone...probably George Soros.  He has a great delivery style when he is prepared but other than that, I think he is not very smart and is not a very good speaker.

Fourth, I saw an article recently that indicated that some banks wanted to give the TARP money back to the government with interest. However, Obama would not take the money back because he wants to keep control over them. Under what Constitutional authority does he do this? If the government loaned money to these banks and they can now pay them off, under what authority does he not take the money back? There is none. I am also convinced that Obama and Congress does not have the authority to bailout any company let along dicatate how much one gets paid. Now the Treasury Department wants to be able to take over companies that did not even take taxpayer money.....this is called socialism/communism.  Can't everyone see this? These banks want to pay the money back but the government won't let them. What would happen if a person wanted to pay extra on their mortgage but the bank would not take the money? What would happen if a person pays their mortgage but the bank refuses to take the money and then evicts the people from the house? This is what is going on and I think everyone would agree that the bank would be in the wrong in those situations.  Obama only cares about power and that is money and that is the reason that he does not take the money back for he would lose power over those banks.  His administration has made the largest power grab in American history and the most liberal Congress, with the lowest rating ever, has let him do it. They should all be impeached, sent home, prosecuted and jailed.  We need to begin again with another revolution but it needs to be done peacfully and with the backing of the people.

Lastly, I have been asking myself why Europe loves Obama so much. I think it is because he has no backbone. He talks a good game but in the end will do nothing to defend America. This is proven by his actions against North Korea for launching a missle that can reach Alaska. He will give harsh words but since China and Russia are really on the side of North Korea, he will end up doing nothing. But some will say that he went to the UN. The UN is nothing.....just a place for people to fight and pass non-important resolutions that have no weight to them at all. Look at Iran...enough said. Obama is loved in Europe because Europe is jealous of America but finally America has elected a president that will bash America and bring it to socialism like that in Europe.  When one is the man on top of the mountain and cannot be beaten off with force, why would those that have been fighting him not love him for coming down from the top of the mountain on his own? This is what is happening and why Europe is in love with Obama and hated Bush. Bush always put America's interest first. Obama will never do that. He will oppress us until we are powerless to do anything about it. And what is sad is that, for the most part, we will all go along like sheep to slaughter. Missery loves company and this is clearly apparent in the attitude of Europe towards Obama for he will ruin this country and turn it into a socialist state.  When Europe loves Obama as much as they do, that is a clear warning sign to the rest of us. We need to wise up and fast before it is too late.

God help us before it is too late.......